|
ABSTRACT
The use of renewable energy sources is becoming increasingly necessary, if we are to achieve the changes required to address the impacts of global warming. Biomass is the most common form of renewable energy, widely used in the third world but until recently, less so in the Western world. Latterly much attention has been focused on identifying suitable biomass species, which can provide high-energy outputs, to replace conventional fossil fuel energy sources. The type of biomass required is largely determined by the energy conversion process and the form in which the energy is required. The potential of reclaimed land of mines to act as a biofuel source, providing fuel to supplement conventional power stations, is examined, together with the replacement of fuels in gas or diesel boilers for the production of thermal energy.
|
|
REFERENCES
[1] Ceulemans R, Deraedt W. Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture. Forest Ecol Manag 1999;121:9.
[2] Kauter D, Lewandowski I, Claupein W. Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short-rotation coppice for solid fuel use e a review of the physiological basis and management influences. Biomass Bioenerg 2003;24:411.
[3] Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2005) Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:385– 406. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 07352680500316334
[4] Kuzovkina YA, Quigley MF (2005) Willows beyond wetlands: uses of Salix L. species for environmental projects. Water Air Soil Pollut 162:183–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-6272-5
[5] Laureysens I, Bogaert J, Blust R, Ceulemans R. Biomass production of 17 poplar clones in a short-rotation coppice culture on a waste disposal site and its relation to soil characteristics. Forest Ecol Manag 2004;187:295.
[6] Dickmann DI. Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: then and now. Biomass Bioenerg 2006;30:696.
[7] Karp A, Shield I. Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytol 2008;179:15.
[8] Al Afas N, Marron N, Van Dongen S, Laureysens I, Ceulemans R. Dynamics of biomass production in a poplar coppice culture over three rotations (11 years). Forest Ecol Manag 2008;255:1883.
[9] Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong FX, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008;319:1238.
[10] Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, et al. Beneficial biofuels e the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 2009;325:270.
[11] Gasol CM, Brun F, Mosso A, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X. Economic assessment and comparison of acacia energy crop with annual traditional crops in Southern Europe. Energy Policy 2010;38:592.
[12] EEA (2011) Biogeographical regions. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen [online] URL:http://www.eea.europa.eu/dataandmaps/ data/biogeographical-regions-europe-1
[13] Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2005) Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:385–406.https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680500316334.
[14] Forestry Commission; 2003. Mensurational variables protocol. In: Yield Models for Energy Coppice of Poplar and Willow. Forestry Commission, Ae. 14.
|
PDF
