|
REFERENCES
[1] OECD, Ageing: Debate the Issues. OECD Insights, OECD Publishing, 2015.
[2] Pollack M., Intelligent technology for an aging population: the use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment, AI Magazine, Volume 26, Number 2, 2005.
[3] Ezer N., Fisk AD., Rogers WA., More than a servant: self-reported willingness of younger and older adults to having a robot perform interactive and critical tasks in the home. Poster presented at: 53rd Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Antonio, TX, 2009.
[4] Broekens J., Heerink M., Rosendal H., Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review, Gerontechnology, Vol.8, No.2, 2009, pp. 94– 103.
[5] Smarr C., Mitzner T., Beer J., Prakash A., Chen T., Kemp C., Rogers W., Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential, Int J Soc Robot, Vol.6, No.2, 2014, pp. 229–247.
[6] Ziefle M., Calero V.A., Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Aging, Design and User Experience, Springer, 2017.
[7] Goetz J., Kiesler S., Powers A., Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEIIT Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN 2003), San Francisco, CA, 2003, pp. 55-60.
[8] Kaplan F., Everyday robotics: robots as everyday objects, In: Proceedings of Soc- Eusai, Grenoble, France, 2005, pp. 59-64.
[9] Lohse M., Hegel F., Wrede B., Domestic applications for social robots: an online survey on the influence of appearance and capabilities, Journal of Physical Agents, Vol.2, No.2, 2008, pp. 21-32.
[10] Wu Y., Wrobel J., Cornuet M., Kerhervé H., Damnée S., Rigaud A., Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1- month period in the Living Lab setting, Clinical Interventions in Aging, Vol.9, 2014, pp. 801–811.
[11] Van der Heijden H., Users acceptance of hedonic information systems, Manag Inf Syst Q, Vol.28, No. 4, 2004, pp. 695-704.
[12] Broekens J., Heerink M., Rosendal H., Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review, Gerontechnology, Vol.8, No.2, 2009, pp.94– 103.
[13] Toshiharu M., Shinya H., Hiromichi N., Yo K., Yuki S., Shijie G., Shigeyuki H., Development of a Nursing-Care Assistant Robot RIBA That Can Lift a Human in Its Arms, The 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010, pp.18-22.
[14] Graf B., Hans M., Schraft R.D., Care-O-bot II—Development of a Next Generation Robotic Home Assistant, Autonomous Robots, Vol.16, 2004, pp. 193-205.
[15] Coradeschi S. et al., Human-Computer Systems Interaction: Backgrounds and Applications 3. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 300, 2014.
[16] Wada K., Shibata T., Saito T., Tanie K., Effects of robot assisted activity to elderly people who stay at a health service facility for the aged, In: Proceedings of IROS 2003: The IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003, pp. 2847-2852.
[17] Ferretti M., Morgavi G., Veruggio G., The ACCEPTABILITY of Caregiver Robots in Elderly People, In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, Vol. 1, 2018, pp. 111-118.
[18] Giulini MV., Scopelliti M., Fornara F., Elderly people at home: Technological help in everyday activities. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international workshop on robots and human interactive communication, 2005, pp. 365–370.
[19] De Ruyter B., Saini P., Markopoulos P., Van Breemen A., Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 17, No.5, 2005, Pages 522-541
[20] Ezer N., Fisk A.D., Rogers W.A., Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, pp. 39–48.
|
PDF
