AUTHOR(S): Ilma Sarimustaqiyma Rianse, Weka Gusmiarty Abdullah, La Ode Midi, Slamet Hartono, Any Suryantini, Jamhari, Weka Widayati
|
TITLE |
ABSTRACT One of the household agro-industries that have been run for a long time by the people in Southeast Sulawesi is palm sugar agroindustry. Production activities often led to externality or external impact. Benefit externality in palm sugar industry is that the palm trees producing saps used to make palm sugar have ecological value. The existence of these plants can absorb carbon emissions and supports land and water conservation. The palm sugar production can also generate negative externalities because the needs for fuel are met by forest firewood. The environmental feasibility of an industry is now an important and strategic issue that must be addressed properly and the industrial performance should be improved continuously, so does the palm sugar domestic industry. Therefore, this study aims at determining the financial, economic, and environmental feasibility of the palm sugar domestic industry. The analytical method used was the Extended Benefit-Cost Ratio. The results of the study indicate that the palm sugar domestic industry was financially feasible (BCR 1.63) with Net Present Value (NPV) of IDR 79,108,459.75, economically feasible (SBCR 8.69) with NPV of IDR 613,547,754.74 and environmentally feasible (EBCR 9.48) with NPV of IDR 636,521,858.41. |
KEYWORDS palm sugar, extended benefit-cost ratio, financial feasibility, economic feasibility, environmental feasibility, benefit externality |
REFERENCES [1] Baka, W. et al, Analysis of Correlation between Brown Sugar Attributes and the Consumer Preference, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematical, Computational and Statistical Sciences (MCSS’14), 2014, pp:367-374. [2] Abdullah, W.G, et al, Potency of Natural Sweetener: Brown Sugar, AENSI Journals. Advances in Enviromental Biology, Vol 8(21), 2014, pp: 374-385. [3] Widodo, S., Reorientasi Pembangunan Pertanian dalam Era Globalisasi dan Tuntutan Reformasi, Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, Vol. VI(1), 1999, pp 38-44 (In Indonesian). [4] Pindyck, R.S. and D. Rubinfeld., Microeconomics: Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall International, New Jersey, 2001. [5] Widyawati, N.,. Sukses Investasi Masa Depan dengan Bertanam Pohon Aren, Lily Publisher, Yogyakarta, 2011 [6] Fauzi, A., Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan, Teori dan Aplikasi. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2004. [7] Sunandar, Nandang, Insentif Ekonomi, Keunggulan Komparatif, Keunggulan Kompetitif pada Usahaternak Sapi Potong di Kabupaten Gunung Kidul, Disertasi, Universtitas Gadjah Mada, 2005. [8] Suprapto, 1999, Keunggulan Komparatif dan Proteksi Efektif Komoditas jagung dan Kedelai di Propinsi Jawa Barat, Program Pasca Sarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. [9] Kusumastuti, T.A., Kajian Keberlanjutan Ternak Kambing Peranakan Etawah Sistem Kandang Kelompok dengan Pendekatan Nilai Ekonomi Lingkungan di Desa Girikerto Turi Sleman, Disertasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2008 [10] Rachman, B., Dampak Keberhasilan Putaran Urugay (GATT) terhadap Usaha Pengembangan Ternak Sapi Perah di Jawa Barat, Tesis, Program Pasca Sarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor, 1995. [11] Mile, Y., M. Siarudin, E. Suhaendah, N. Kuswandi, A. Badrunasar, Y. Nurahmah dan U. Saefudin, Pengembangan Model Hutan Rakyat dalam Kerangka MPB dan Jasa Lingkungan Perdagangan Karbon, Laporan Hasil Penelitian Balai Penelitian Kehutanan Ciamis, Ciamis, 2008. [12] Kim, C.Y., Pola Pengelolaan Hutan Tropika Berdasar pada Konsep Nilai Ekonomi Total, Disertasi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2002. [13] PERMEN L.H., Panduan Valuasi Ekonomi Ekosistem Hutan Nomor 15 Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 2012. |
Cite this paper Ilma Sarimustaqiyma Rianse, Weka Gusmiarty Abdullah, La Ode Midi, Slamet Hartono, Any Suryantini, Jamhari, Weka Widayati. (2016) Financial, Economic and Environmental Feasibility Analysis of Palm Sugar Domestic Industry in Kolaka Indonesia . International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 1, 104-109 |
|